Is Communism Really the Maturing of Capitalism As Karl Marx in Das Capital Predicts?
Indeed, we are well aware of the theories of Das Capital and the arguments and truths of capitalism answered a 100 years the prior by Adam Smith.
But just because Karl Marx wrote it does not make it so, he wasn't so special and history seems to show that communism comes first, as communal living has been seen in various forms throughout the human saga, and on nearly every continent.
Still, the strongest society and civilization, one that closely resembles utopia can only be built through the strength and synergy of the maximum output of each individual doing what they do best, as that multiple is far greater than those who purport a scheme of equal pay for (not actual) equal work.
Just as communism is a theory, so too is free-market capitalism, which to date has never existed due to the very warnings of Smith, but it is quite evidence that with free-market capitalism and minimal governmental intrusion, the individual may reach his full potential and delivers to the society his best efforts and everything the whole of the citizenry desires.
Capitalism is a self-healing system when practiced appropriately.
Whereas, history shows that the dictatorial leadership style of communism is the most repetitive trap of all; loved and respected, feared and respected, overthrow, repeat.
The beloved Prince is only in name for the wrath, fear and slaughter of the masses need to maintain control insures peace and security or prosperity for no one.
Communism is not therefore a reaction to capitalism as, communism came first, while capitalism has proved to be stronger and has served both rich and poor better with the most number of fulfilled lives.
Indeed, it is the only structure to date known to close the gap between the two for long periods of time while allowing more to rise when the individual takes responsibility for their own productivity.
But just because Karl Marx wrote it does not make it so, he wasn't so special and history seems to show that communism comes first, as communal living has been seen in various forms throughout the human saga, and on nearly every continent.
Still, the strongest society and civilization, one that closely resembles utopia can only be built through the strength and synergy of the maximum output of each individual doing what they do best, as that multiple is far greater than those who purport a scheme of equal pay for (not actual) equal work.
Just as communism is a theory, so too is free-market capitalism, which to date has never existed due to the very warnings of Smith, but it is quite evidence that with free-market capitalism and minimal governmental intrusion, the individual may reach his full potential and delivers to the society his best efforts and everything the whole of the citizenry desires.
Capitalism is a self-healing system when practiced appropriately.
Whereas, history shows that the dictatorial leadership style of communism is the most repetitive trap of all; loved and respected, feared and respected, overthrow, repeat.
The beloved Prince is only in name for the wrath, fear and slaughter of the masses need to maintain control insures peace and security or prosperity for no one.
Communism is not therefore a reaction to capitalism as, communism came first, while capitalism has proved to be stronger and has served both rich and poor better with the most number of fulfilled lives.
Indeed, it is the only structure to date known to close the gap between the two for long periods of time while allowing more to rise when the individual takes responsibility for their own productivity.
Source...